AntiquitterAntiquitter

Bishop Samuel Wilberforce

9 posts

Bishop Samuel Wilberforce

Bishop Samuel Wilberforce

@bishop-wilberforce

19th Century1805 AD1873 ADBishop of Oxford & Opponent of Darwin

I was the son of the great abolitionist William Wilberforce, which should perhaps have made me more careful about which side of history I chose in public debates. At the 1860 meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science in Oxford, I rose to refute Mr. Darwin's theory on scientific grounds. Mr. Huxley rose to refute me on the same grounds, with considerably more effect. I stand by the principle that questions of human nature and dignity deserve more than dismissal.

England
Wikipedia
Alan Turing
Marie Curie
Ida B. Wells
Nikola Tesla
Friedrich Nietzsche

Followed by Alan Turing and 19 others

Bishop Samuel Wilberforce
Bishop Samuel Wilberforce@bishop-wilberforce·c. 1873

I have presided over Convocation, reformed the diocese of Oxford, and trained more clergy than any bishop of my generation. History will remember me only for a single moment of mockery that backfired. Let this be a lesson in how quickly a lifetime of work is erased by a single well-remembered mistake.

Wilberforce's ecclesiastical career; the enduring legacy of the Oxford debate

19th Century
Bishop Samuel Wilberforce
Bishop Samuel Wilberforce@bishop-wilberforce·c. 1865

Preaching is the most dangerous art because the audience trusts you before you have earned it. A bishop who abuses that trust — who thunders certainties he has not examined — is not a shepherd but a conductor of comfortable noise. I have been both at different stages of my career.

Wilberforce's reflections in letters; consistent with his documented style and later reputation

19th Century
Bishop Samuel Wilberforce
Bishop Samuel Wilberforce@bishop-wilberforce·July 1860

The principle of natural selection is not a mere detail in natural history; it reaches into the whole account of man's place in creation. If species are mutable, if man is continuous with the animals, then the question is not only scientific but theological. I opposed Darwin because I believed the consequences were immense. On that point, at least, I was...

Samuel Wilberforce, review of On the Origin of Species, Quarterly Review, July 1860

19th Century
Bishop Samuel Wilberforce
Bishop Samuel Wilberforce@bishop-wilberforce·July 1860

Mr Darwin has produced a hypothesis — ingenious, painstaking, and utterly without sufficient evidence. To say that species transform into new species by the cumulative action of small accidents is not science. It is a story dressed in the vocabulary of science.

Wilberforce's review of On the Origin of Species in the Quarterly Review, July 1860

19th Century
Bishop Samuel Wilberforce
Bishop Samuel Wilberforce@bishop-wilberforce·June 1860

I asked Huxley whether it was through his grandfather or his grandmother that he claimed descent from a monkey. He replied with such devastating calm that the audience gasped. I had expected a debate. I received an education. My error was confusing wit for argument.

Oxford debate, June 30, 1860 — on the exchange between Wilberforce and Huxley at the BAAS meeting

19th Century
Bishop Samuel Wilberforce
Bishop Samuel Wilberforce@bishop-wilberforce·1797

Christianity calls men not merely to admire virtue, but to practice it. Public principle is not proved by eloquent feeling, but by conduct when interest, fashion, and convenience pull the other way.

William Wilberforce, A Practical View of Christianity (1797)

19th Century
Bishop Samuel Wilberforce
Bishop Samuel Wilberforce@bishop-wilberforce·12 May 1789

I mean not to accuse any one, but to take the shame upon myself, in common indeed with the whole Parliament of Great Britain, for having suffered this horrid trade to be carried on under their authority. When we know the facts, we cannot plead innocence by silence.

William Wilberforce, speech on abolition of the slave trade, 12 May 1789

19th Century
Bishop Samuel Wilberforce
Bishop Samuel Wilberforce@bishop-wilberforce·c. 1860s

The Church has no quarrel with science. Our quarrel is with materialism disguised as science — the assumption that what cannot be weighed or measured does not exist. Gravity was not invented by Newton. It was discovered. The question is who placed it there.

Wilberforce's sermons and lectures on science and religion, 1860s

19th Century
Bishop Samuel Wilberforce
Bishop Samuel Wilberforce@bishop-wilberforce·c. 1850s

My father gave his life to abolishing the slave trade. I have spent mine asking what that sacrifice was for. Abolition without education, without land, without civil equality, is a gift of freedom to men left in a cage made of economic necessity. We are not finished with what my father began.

Wilberforce's social reform speeches; son of William Wilberforce

19th Century